leftish:

Does anyone else marvel at the amount of packaging corporations use to send out their products?
[Here is a letter I wrote to USA Business Products today]
To Whom It May Concern ~
There was a massive box on my porch today.  I couldn’t imagine what it might be.  The only thing I had ordered was 6 packs of Glossy Photo Paper,  Surely this massive box couldn’t be that, could it?
Actually, and sadly, it was.
I received my order from your company today, and I have to tell you, I was appalled.  I ordered 6 packages of KOD 8209017 Glossy Photo Paper 100 packs.  You did not have them in one location, I guess, because there were packing slips from two different locations inside the gigantic box that housed TWO SEPARATE SMALLER BOXES, one with 5 packs of paper and one with 1 pack of paper!
The box with 5 packages measured 9x14x5.
The box with 1 package measured 9x14x8 and was stuffed with 6 air pillows!
The two boxes were then thrown into a gigantic box together (21x18x13) along with 16 more (that’s right, 16!) air pillows and shipped off to me.  So there was a total of 22 air pillows used for my 6 packs of paper!
I have been given the gift of THREE cardboard boxes, in varying sizes from small to massive, plus 22 air pillows that need to be recycled.
What if I lived in a tiny apartment?  Where am I supposed to put this excessive packaging?
But that is not my biggest concern - consumer difficulties.
I am writing to you today to open up a dialogue with whomever manages your Packaging/Shipping purchases and policies.
I want to suggest that you are WASTING MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF MONEY AND RESOURCES with your CARELESS SHIPPING PRACTICES.
I have been researching this issue for a while, and am in the middle of writing a piece about it, rife with incriminating photos of shipments I have received, similar to yours.
Here’s the bottom line.
Every time you package something in a bigger container than is needed you are incurring enormous waste.  Not only on the cost of the unnecessarily large container, but on the cost of the popcorns, air pillows or whatever that is used to fill it up, as well as the cost of extra tape that is used to seal it.  Not only that, but CARDBOARD BOXES DON’T GROW ON TREES!!  Trees are cut down to make these cardboard boxes you are so carelessly throwing about.
From there you need to look at the cost of the extra SPACE ON THE TRUCK that you are paying for.  You are paying to transport AIR!  Because your packages are so unnecessarily large, you need to use more trucks than is necessary to get them delivered, costing YOU more for EXTRA GAS, as well as EXTRA EMPLOYEE PAY.  And then there is the consumer.  You are burdening your consumer with more waste and packaging than they need, which now has to be disposed of.  Luckily, I have an online business and am usually able to re-use almost all of the packaging materials I am sent, but that is not the case with many of your customers, I’m sure.
My two separate boxes of paper packs were obviously together, in the same shipping station, at some point, since they were thrown into the gigantic box together.  The 5 pack of paper could easily have fit in the box that had the other single pack (which was in the BIGGER small box).  All your shipper had to do was open up the two boxes, and put the five packs inside the other box, and dispose of the smaller box.  Instead, your shipper elected to throw the two boxes, as is, into another massive box, and ship it that way.  That is RIDICULOUS.
I suggest that you reconsider your shipping practices, and make every effort to have your goal be as LITTLE packaging as possible.  In fact, you might offer a $100 reward each week, in each location, to the shipper who packages the greatest number of items in the smallest amount of volume!  The amount of waste your company creates must be monumental.  You could probably save yourselves thousands upon thousands of dollars by revamping your irresponsible shipping practices.
I was told by an employee in your Sales Dept that somebody would call me.  She took my phone number and said she expedited my complaint, and assured me that someone in the Purchasing and/or Shipping Department would get back to me.
I was assured that someone from your company, who is in a position to actually make decisions, and can address and correct this situation, would be getting in touch with me by phone.
I look forward to speaking with someone from your company.
Thank you. 
Sincerely,
Tara Thralls
P.S. I took photos of the boxes, and of the long stream of air pillows, however, I didn’t include them, as I am not sure if you would even open an attachment.
************************************************************************
Does this bother you, too?  I can’t be the only one that is astounded by the amount of Corporate Waste that is generated in the Shipping and Packaging of their products, right?

leftish:

Does anyone else marvel at the amount of packaging corporations use to send out their products?

[Here is a letter I wrote to USA Business Products today]

To Whom It May Concern ~

There was a massive box on my porch today.  I couldn’t imagine what it might be.  The only thing I had ordered was 6 packs of Glossy Photo Paper,  Surely this massive box couldn’t be that, could it?

Actually, and sadly, it was.

I received my order from your company today, and I have to tell you, I was appalled.  I ordered 6 packages of KOD 8209017 Glossy Photo Paper 100 packs.  You did not have them in one location, I guess, because there were packing slips from two different locations inside the gigantic box that housed TWO SEPARATE SMALLER BOXES, one with 5 packs of paper and one with 1 pack of paper!

The box with 5 packages measured 9x14x5.

The box with 1 package measured 9x14x8 and was stuffed with 6 air pillows!

The two boxes were then thrown into a gigantic box together (21x18x13) along with 16 more (that’s right, 16!) air pillows and shipped off to me.  So there was a total of 22 air pillows used for my 6 packs of paper!

I have been given the gift of THREE cardboard boxes, in varying sizes from small to massive, plus 22 air pillows that need to be recycled.

What if I lived in a tiny apartment?  Where am I supposed to put this excessive packaging?

But that is not my biggest concern - consumer difficulties.

I am writing to you today to open up a dialogue with whomever manages your Packaging/Shipping purchases and policies.

I want to suggest that you are WASTING MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF MONEY AND RESOURCES with your CARELESS SHIPPING PRACTICES.

I have been researching this issue for a while, and am in the middle of writing a piece about it, rife with incriminating photos of shipments I have received, similar to yours.

Here’s the bottom line.

Every time you package something in a bigger container than is needed you are incurring enormous waste.  Not only on the cost of the unnecessarily large container, but on the cost of the popcorns, air pillows or whatever that is used to fill it up, as well as the cost of extra tape that is used to seal it.  Not only that, but CARDBOARD BOXES DON’T GROW ON TREES!!  Trees are cut down to make these cardboard boxes you are so carelessly throwing about.

From there you need to look at the cost of the extra SPACE ON THE TRUCK that you are paying for.  You are paying to transport AIR!  Because your packages are so unnecessarily large, you need to use more trucks than is necessary to get them delivered, costing YOU more for EXTRA GAS, as well as EXTRA EMPLOYEE PAY.  And then there is the consumer.  You are burdening your consumer with more waste and packaging than they need, which now has to be disposed of.  Luckily, I have an online business and am usually able to re-use almost all of the packaging materials I am sent, but that is not the case with many of your customers, I’m sure.

My two separate boxes of paper packs were obviously together, in the same shipping station, at some point, since they were thrown into the gigantic box together.  The 5 pack of paper could easily have fit in the box that had the other single pack (which was in the BIGGER small box).  All your shipper had to do was open up the two boxes, and put the five packs inside the other box, and dispose of the smaller box.  Instead, your shipper elected to throw the two boxes, as is, into another massive box, and ship it that way.  That is RIDICULOUS.

I suggest that you reconsider your shipping practices, and make every effort to have your goal be as LITTLE packaging as possible.  In fact, you might offer a $100 reward each week, in each location, to the shipper who packages the greatest number of items in the smallest amount of volume!  The amount of waste your company creates must be monumental.  You could probably save yourselves thousands upon thousands of dollars by revamping your irresponsible shipping practices.

I was told by an employee in your Sales Dept that somebody would call me.  She took my phone number and said she expedited my complaint, and assured me that someone in the Purchasing and/or Shipping Department would get back to me.

I was assured that someone from your company, who is in a position to actually make decisions, and can address and correct this situation, would be getting in touch with me by phone.

I look forward to speaking with someone from your company.

Thank you. 

Sincerely,

Tara Thralls

P.S. I took photos of the boxes, and of the long stream of air pillows, however, I didn’t include them, as I am not sure if you would even open an attachment.

************************************************************************

Does this bother you, too?  I can’t be the only one that is astounded by the amount of Corporate Waste that is generated in the Shipping and Packaging of their products, right?

mehreenkasana:

In this map of total trash generation, the US and China stand out as the biggest offenders. China still has a long way to go before catching up to American levels of per capita trash production, but its municipal waste problem is all the more critical with the skyrocketing population growth. In 2025, China will be producing 562 million tons of solid waste per year, according to World Bank estimates—almost three times the current output.

Holy wow.

(via bohemianarthouse)

Tags: aluminum waste

tartantambourine:

The U.S. House of Representatives passed an amendment on April 18 to the Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2012 (HR 4348) that would effectively pre-empt the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from regulating coal ash, the waste from coal burning plants, as a hazardous waste. About 140 million tons of coal ash are produced by power plants in the United States each year. There are about 1,000 active coal ash storage sites across the country. According to the EPA, the ash contains concentrations of arsenic, boron, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury and other metals, but the coal industry has claimed there is less mercury in the ash than in a fluorescent light bulb. However, the EPA found in 2010 that the cancer risk from arsenic near some unlined coal ash ponds was one in 50 — 2,000 times the agency’s regulatory goal. Additionally, researchers from the Environmental Integrity Project, Earthjustice, and Sierra Club have documented water contamination from coal ash sites in 186 locations. The new bill would strip the EPA’s authority to regulate the ash and hand it over to the states.

And, here again, ALEC, the American Legislative Exchange Council, has pushed the idea of stopping the EPA from regulating coal ash.

(via reagan-was-a-horrible-president)

By all accounts, Simmons is one of the most generous, if not the most generous, Republican billionaire in 2012. But even more interesting is why, exactly, he’s investing so heavily in the elections, and what he hopes to receive in return.

Mariah Blake has an interesting report this week on the 80-year-old Simmons’ nuclear waste dump in Texas, which may be a key motivation behind his generosity.

Simmons has a history of giving far and wide to grease the wheels for his business ventures — particularly his nuclear waste repository. And a raft of changes in the pipeline at federal agencies could determine whether the site is eligible for billions of dollars in new contracts.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, for example, is considering allowing depleted uranium (more than a half-million tons of which are languishing at sites around the country) to be discarded in shallow land burial sites, like [Simmons’ Waste Control Specialists’], even though the National Research Council and some independent scientists suggest it’s better suited to more secure repositories. Similarly, the Department of Energy is weighing options for disposing of what is known as “greater-than-class-C” waste, the most radioactive low-level nuclear debris. In the past, it was generally considered too dangerous to dump in shallow land sites, but that route is now on the table.

These deliberations, which began under the Bush administration, aren’t meant to be political. But progress under Obama has been halting, particularly on the NRC front. In fact, in January the NRC voted to abandon the depleted uranium rulemaking track it had been on since 2008 — a track favorable to WCS — and go back to the drawing board.

There are also nuclear-waste disposal contracts available through the Department of Energy, and as Blake noted, Simmons “may be betting that having Republicans in office — particularly ones whose victory he bankrolled — could tilt the odds in his favor, as it has in the past.”

This isn’t to say Simmons is apolitical, donating simply with his business interests in mind. The far-right Texan makes no secret of his disgust for President Obama, whom Simmon recently described as “the most dangerous American alive” — and no doubt backs Republicans because he agrees with them.

But as Bloomberg’s Julie Bykowicz reported, Simmons has also “a West Texas dump for radioactive waste that is bigger than 1,000 football fields and he can’t fill it,” so he’s “spending money in a new way that could improve his business prospects,” investing in Republicans who “advocate easing regulations on the nuclear industry.”

(Source: sarahlee310, via reagan-was-a-horrible-president)

singularitarian:

A technique that combines two novel forms of renewable energy — one relying on bacteria and the other on salt water — generates more electricity than either one alone and cleans waste water at the same time. The work is published today in Science

(via infinitecircuit)

Tags: waste energy

River Of Waste

kwikset:

Protests in #Germany continue against transportation of Castor nuclear waste containers. Protesters have been rallying since Nov 25 and have tried a variety of techniques to stop the train carrying nuclear waste. Including chaining themselves to concrete blocks on the tracks, placing stones upon the tracks, bending the tracks themselves (which have since been repaired), as well as building a street blockade of tree branches. According to AP reporting from Berlin over 1,000 people were temporary detained on Sunday, Nov 28.

Photos: Reuters
More from AP/NYTimes: https://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/28/world/europe/german-police-clear-thousands-at-nuclear-protest.html?_r=1

(via randomactsofchaos)

"

When a white man kills an Indian in a fair fight it is called honorable, but when an Indian kills a white man in a fair fight it is called murder. When a white army battles Indians and wins it is called a great victory, but if they lose it is called a massacre and bigger armies are raised.

If the Indian flees before the advance of such armies, when he tries to return he finds that white men are living where he lived. If he tries to fight off such armies, he is killed and the land is taken anyway. When an Indian is killed, it is a great loss which leaves a gap in our people and a sorrow in our heart; when a white is killed three or four others step up to take his place and there is no end to it.

The white man seeks to conquer nature, to bend it to his will and to use it wastefully until it is all gone and then he simply moves on, leaving the waste behind him and looking for new places to take. The whole white race is a monster who is always hungry and what he eats is land.

"

— Chiksika (via cultureofresistance)

(Source: socialuprooting, via gravewisdom-deactivated20111121)

(Source: iamnotapear, via dxo)

Tags: waste

fortheocean:

“Imagine 8 football fields covered  thickly with plastic bottles: this is  the equivalent to the number of  plastic beverage bottles discarded in the US every five minutes (data:  2009)
Now imagine a line of plastic bottles going around the planet five  times. This would be equivalent to the number of plastic bottles  discarded every week in the US.. just for water!  (data 2009)
Now imagine the waste created by all types of single use plastics put  together,  by all the countries in the world (the US is only 5% of the  worlds population)… This includes plastic bottles, plastic bags, plastic  utensils, cups, containers and more.”
For every 6 pounds of small plastic found in the water, there’s one pound for plankton.
http://plasticpollutioncoalition.org/

fortheocean:

“Imagine 8 football fields covered thickly with plastic bottles: this is  the equivalent to the number of plastic beverage bottles discarded in the US every five minutes (data: 2009)

Now imagine a line of plastic bottles going around the planet five times. This would be equivalent to the number of plastic bottles discarded every week in the US.. just for water!  (data 2009)

Now imagine the waste created by all types of single use plastics put together,  by all the countries in the world (the US is only 5% of the worlds population)… This includes plastic bottles, plastic bags, plastic utensils, cups, containers and more.”

For every 6 pounds of small plastic found in the water, there’s one pound for plankton.

http://plasticpollutioncoalition.org/

(via socialuprooting)

Tags: plastic waste